Research Question

How well has the Tesla Model S retained its value over the past 5 years (2020-2025)?

Executive Summary

The Tesla Model S has experienced poor value retention over the past 5 years, with depreciation rates significantly higher than the automotive average and comparable to or worse than traditional German luxury sedans. The Model S loses approximately 63-71% of its value over 5 years, depending on the source and specific model year.

Key Findings:

  • 5-year depreciation: 63-71% value loss
  • Recent acceleration in depreciation (2024-2025)
  • Better than some competitors, worse than market average
  • Significant variation by model year

Detailed Depreciation Data

Overall 5-Year Depreciation Rates

Tesla Model S (General):

  • CarEdge Data: 71% depreciation over 5 years (resale value: 88,880 MSRP)
  • Alternative Estimates: 63.3% ($46,215 loss) to 65.2%
  • Optimistic Estimates: 35% (likely based on different baseline pricing)

By Year:

Time PeriodDepreciationResale ValueResidual %
After 1 Year$25,091$63,78971.77%
After 3 Years$57,736$31,14435.04%
After 5 Years$62,856$26,02429.28%
After 7 Years$69,549$19,33121.75%

Specific Model Years (2020-2024)

2020 Model S:

  • Current resale value (2025): $30,193
  • Trade-in value: $24,774
  • Ranking: 75-100% percentile for depreciation among 2020 sedans (relatively good)
  • Assessment: Attractive year with relatively good value

2021 Model S:

  • Assessment: Attractive year with relatively good value
  • Specific depreciation data: Not provided in sources

2022 Model S:

  • Best value year - buyers pay ~35% of original price while retaining 75% of useful life
  • Ranking: 75-100% percentile for depreciation among 2022 sedans
  • Assessment: Offers the best value proposition

2023 Model S:

  • Ranking: 25-75% percentile for depreciation among 2023 sedans (worse than 2020/2022)
  • Assessment: Moderate value retention

2023 Model S Plaid:

  • Specific tracking available but exact figures not provided in search results

Accelerated Depreciation:

  • Model S lost most value of any model in recent study
  • Year-over-year loss (March 2024 - March 2025): 17.2% (-$9,944)
  • Average used Model S price (March 2025): $47,931

Contributing Factors:

  • Tesla’s frequent and unpredictable price adjustments
  • Brand perception challenges
  • Market oversaturation
  • Competition from newer EVs

Comparison to Luxury Sedan Competitors

German Luxury Sedans (5-Year Depreciation)

Mid-Size Luxury Competitors:

  • BMW 5 Series: 70.1% depreciation (worst in class)
  • Mercedes-Benz E-Class: 69.0% depreciation
  • Audi A6: 69.0% depreciation

Full-Size Luxury Competitors:

  • Mercedes S-Class: 67.1% depreciation
  • BMW 7 Series: Among fastest depreciating cars

Brand Averages:

  • Audi: 64.6% average depreciation across model line
  • BMW: Notorious for fast-dropping resale values

Comparative Analysis

Tesla Model S vs Traditional Luxury:

  • Model S (71%): Slightly worse than BMW 5 Series (70.1%)
  • Model S: Comparable to or slightly worse than E-Class/A6 (69%)
  • All luxury sedans significantly worse than market average (40%)

Positioning:

  • Tesla ranks in top 3 among luxury brands for 5-year and 7-year value retention periods
  • Better performer than many luxury EVs
  • Still loses more value than average vehicles

Depreciation Pattern Analysis

Depreciation Curve Shape

Year 1: Moderate depreciation (~28% loss)

  • Most “new car” depreciation hit
  • Better than traditional luxury first-year drop

Years 2-3: Steep depreciation (~65% cumulative)

  • Sharpest value loss period
  • Price adjustments hit existing owners hardest

Years 4-5: Curve flattening

  • Depreciation slows significantly
  • Percentage loss decreases
  • Market stabilization for older models

Years 6-7: Continued gradual decline

  • More predictable depreciation
  • Approaching “used EV” baseline value

Key Inflection Points

  1. First 3 years: 30-40% drop typical (some sources show steeper)
  2. 5-year mark: 63-71% total depreciation
  3. Post-5 years: Curve flattens substantially

Factors Affecting Model S Depreciation

Primary Negative Factors

  1. Tesla’s Price Volatility

    • Frequent, unpredictable MSRP adjustments
    • Example: $10,000 overnight price cuts destroy existing owner equity
    • Creates uncertainty in used market pricing
  2. Technology Obsolescence

    • Rapid improvements in newer models
    • Battery technology advancement
    • Software/hardware updates make older models less desirable
  3. High Luxury EV Depreciation Trend

    • EVs generally depreciate faster than ICE vehicles
    • Luxury segment compounds the effect
    • Battery degradation concerns
  4. Brand Perception Issues (2024-2025)

    • CEO controversies affecting brand value
    • Quality control concerns
    • Service network limitations
  5. Market Competition

    • Increased EV options from traditional luxury brands
    • Better build quality from competitors
    • More dealer support infrastructure

Positive Factors

  1. Strong Brand Recognition

    • Tesla remains aspirational EV brand
    • Name recognition drives demand
  2. Government Incentives

    • Historical purchase incentives helped initial values
    • Used EV tax credits (where applicable)
  3. Over-the-Air Updates

    • Vehicles improve over time
    • Extended useful life vs traditional cars
  4. Performance Reputation

    • Desirable acceleration/handling
    • Technology leadership perception
  5. Supercharger Network

    • Exclusive access (historically)
    • Infrastructure advantage

Value Retention by Use Case

Best Model Years to Buy Used (2025)

For Value:

  1. 2022 Model S - Best value proposition (35% of original, 75% useful life)
  2. 2020-2021 Model S - Good balance of features and depreciation
  3. Avoid: 2023+ (still depreciating rapidly)

Best Model Years for Original Owners

Least Bad Depreciation:

  1. 2020 Model S - Strong performer in its cohort
  2. 2022 Model S - Good residual characteristics
  3. Avoid: 2023-2024 (accelerated recent depreciation)

New vs Used Decision

Buying New (2025):

  • Expect ~28% loss in year 1
  • ~65% loss in 3 years
  • ~71% loss in 5 years
  • High risk due to price volatility

Buying Used:

  • 2022 models offer best value
  • 5+ year old models have flattened depreciation curves
  • Lower risk of sudden price-cut impacts

Comparison to EV Market

Tesla vs Other EVs

Tesla Performance:

  • Model S performs “remarkably well for an alternative fuel vehicle”
  • Top 3 among luxury brands for long-term retention
  • Better than most early-generation EVs

Industry Context:

  • EVs generally depreciate faster than ICE vehicles
  • Luxury EVs worst segment for depreciation
  • Model S competitive within luxury EV space

Financial Implications

Cost of Ownership (5 Years)

Example: $100,000 Model S purchased in 2020

Depreciation Loss:

  • Pessimistic: $71,000 (71% depreciation)
  • Optimistic: $63,000 (63% depreciation)
  • Average annual loss: 14,200

Comparison to competitors:

  • BMW 5 Series (60,000 loss
  • Mercedes E-Class (45,000 loss
  • Model S loses more in absolute dollars due to higher starting price

Total Cost of Ownership Considerations

Depreciation Impact:

  • Largest single ownership cost
  • Higher than fuel savings vs ICE
  • Partially offset by lower maintenance

Mitigating Factors:

  • Lower operating costs (electricity < gas)
  • Minimal maintenance requirements
  • Tax incentives (historical)
  • Insurance considerations (higher for Tesla)

Recommendations

For Prospective Buyers

If Buying New:

  • Be prepared for rapid depreciation (70%+ in 5 years)
  • Plan to keep vehicle 7+ years to ride out steep curve
  • Avoid if resale value is important to you
  • Consider leasing to avoid depreciation risk

If Buying Used:

  • Target 2022 model year for best value
  • Consider 5+ year old models (flatter depreciation curve)
  • Verify battery health and warranty coverage
  • Factor in potential continued depreciation

For Current Owners

Value Preservation:

  • Minimize mileage accumulation
  • Maintain detailed service records
  • Keep software updated
  • Consider extended warranty for resale appeal
  • Time sale before major model refreshes

When to Sell:

  • Before 3-year mark if minimizing loss
  • After 5+ years, curve has flattened (less urgent)
  • Avoid selling immediately after Tesla price cuts
  • Consider private sale vs trade-in ($5,400+ difference)

Data Quality & Limitations

Source Variability

  • Different sources show 63-71% depreciation range
  • Methodology differences (MSRP baseline, regional pricing, trim levels)
  • Time period variations (some 2020-2025, others 2024-2029 projections)

Market Volatility

  • 2024-2025 showed unusual acceleration
  • Brand-specific factors may be temporary
  • EV market rapidly evolving

Limitations

  • Data primarily US-focused
  • May not reflect regional variations
  • Trim level differences not always specified
  • Limited data on very recent model years

Conclusion

The Tesla Model S has experienced poor value retention over the 2020-2025 period, with depreciation comparable to or worse than traditional German luxury sedans. While it performs well relative to other luxury EVs and benefits from factors like OTA updates and the Supercharger network, prospective buyers should expect to lose 63-71% of the vehicle’s value over 5 years.

Key Takeaways:

  1. ❌ Model S is NOT a good investment for value retention
  2. ✅ Model S performs relatively well compared to BMW/Mercedes/Audi luxury sedans
  3. ⚠️ Recent acceleration in depreciation (2024-2025) is concerning
  4. 💡 Best used value: 2022 model year
  5. 📉 Expect ~14,200 annual depreciation on $100k purchase

Bottom Line: If you’re buying a Tesla Model S, buy it because you want to drive it, not because you expect it to hold its value. Plan to keep it long-term or lease to avoid depreciation risk.


Sources & References


Research Metadata

Research Date: November 3, 2025 Time Period Analyzed: 2020-2025 (5 years) Primary Focus: Tesla Model S value retention and depreciation Comparative Analysis: German luxury sedans (BMW, Mercedes, Audi) Data Quality: Multiple sources with some conflicting figures; general trends consistent