glm-4.7-flash-performance
Purpose
Comprehensive analysis of GLM 4.7 Flash model performance vs SOTA models, hardware requirements for local deployment, quantization options, and specific guidance for Mac Studio M3 Ultra with 256GB RAM.
Model Overview
Release: January 19, 2026 by Zhipu AI
Architecture: 30B-A3B Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) model
- Total parameters: 30 billion
- Active parameters per token: ~3 billion (5 of 64 experts activated)
- Context window: 200K tokens
- Output capacity: 128K tokens
- Architecture: Multi-Headed Latent Attention (MLA)
Design Philosophy: Optimized specifically for local deployment on consumer hardware while maintaining competitive performance with larger models.
Key Findings
Positioning
- #1 ranked open-weight model in 30B parameter class (January 2026)
- Strongest model in the 30B category for balancing performance and efficiency
- Designed as a practical alternative to slower (DeepSeek) or less precise (MiMo-V2-Flash) options
Performance Characteristics
- Speed: 60-80+ tokens/second on consumer hardware (24GB GPUs or Mac M-series)
- Interactive latency: 55 tokens/second provides responsive experience
- Quality: Maintains depth of logic while offering superior speed vs competitors
Benchmark Performance
Coding Benchmarks (Elite Performance)
SWE-bench Verified (Real-world GitHub Issue Resolution)
- GLM 4.7 Flash: 73.8% (SOTA for open models)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.4%
- DeepSeek-V3.2: 73.1%
- GLM 4.7 (base): 59.2%
- Qwen3-30B: 22%
- GPT-OSS-20B: 34%
Analysis: GLM 4.7 dramatically outperforms comparable-sized models, approaching proprietary model performance on practical coding tasks.
LiveCodeBench-v6 (Algorithmic Reasoning & Syntax)
- GLM 4.7: 84.9% (leader)
- DeepSeek-V3.2: 83.3%
- Kimi K2 Thinking: 83.1%
Analysis: Clear leader in algorithmic reasoning within its class.
τ² (Tau-Squared) Bench
- Achieves open-source SOTA scores among models of comparable size
Comparison with Other Models
GLM 4.7 vs Top Models (17 Benchmarks: 8 reasoning, 5 coding, 3 agents)
Open-Weight Rankings:
vs DeepSeek V3.2 (Thinking mode):
- SWE-bench: GLM 4.7 (67.0%) vs DeepSeek (68.8%) - nearly tied
- Terminal Bench: Both in top tier among open-weight models
vs Proprietary Models:
- Tested against: GPT-5, GPT-5.1-High, Claude Sonnet 4.5, Gemini 3.0 Pro
- GPT-5.2 currently SOTA overall (especially coding: 35.6% on Vibe Code Bench vs previous 24.6%)
- GLM 4.7 competes strongly but proprietary models maintain edge in absolute performance
Competitive Position (Early 2026)
- Qwen3: Matches/exceeds DeepSeek V3.1 and Claude 4 Sonnet across wide range of benchmarks
- GLM 4.7: Best in 30B class; trades slightly lower absolute performance for much better speed and deployability
Hardware Requirements
Minimum Requirements (Quantized)
- VRAM: 16 GB with 4-bit quantization
- System RAM: 16 GB minimum
- Compatible Hardware:
- RTX 3090 (24GB)
- RTX 4090 (24GB)
- Mac Studio M1/M2/M3 Max (24-36GB unified memory)
Performance: 35-55 tokens/second on M3 Pro (36GB) with 4-bit quantization
Recommended Configuration
- VRAM: 24-36 GB for optimal experience
- Context Window: 4-8K tokens (practical recommendation)
- Quantization: 4-bit or 5-bit
- Performance: 60-80 tokens/second
Full Precision (BF16)
- VRAM: ~64 GB required
- Recommended Hardware:
- Mac Studio Ultra (192GB+ unified memory)
- 2x A100 80GB GPUs
- High-end workstations
Full GPU Offloading (Q4_K_M):
- Requires ~130GB VRAM (e.g., 2x A100 80GB or Mac Studio Ultra)
- Single A100 (80GB): Use Q2_K or IQ2_XXS with
-ngl 40to split between GPU and system RAM
Mac Studio M3 Ultra Deployment (256GB RAM)
Your Hardware Advantages
With Mac Studio M3 Ultra (256GB unified memory), you have exceptional capability for running GLM 4.7 Flash:
- Full precision (BF16) deployment - Your 256GB is well above the 64GB requirement
- Large context windows - Can handle full 200K context with room to spare
- Maximum performance - Unified memory architecture eliminates GPU-CPU transfer bottlenecks
- Multi-model hosting - Can run multiple models simultaneously
Recommended Configuration for M3 Ultra
Option 1: Maximum Quality (Recommended)
- Quantization: BF16 (full precision) or FP16
- Context: Up to 200K tokens (model maximum)
- Expected Performance: 70-90+ tokens/second
- Memory Usage: ~64GB for model, leaving 192GB for context and other processes
Option 2: Speed-Optimized
- Quantization: 4-bit (Q4_K_M)
- Context: Full 200K tokens
- Expected Performance: 90-120+ tokens/second
- Memory Usage: ~30GB for model, 226GB remaining
Option 3: Multi-Model Setup
- Primary: GLM 4.7 Flash (BF16) - 64GB
- Secondary: Smaller model (e.g., 7B-8B) - 14-16GB
- Context: Large contexts for both
- Use case: Different models for different tasks simultaneously
Performance Expectations on M3 Ultra
Based on M3 Pro benchmarks (35-55 tok/s with 4-bit on 36GB):
- M3 Ultra scaling: Significantly higher memory bandwidth and GPU cores
- Conservative estimate: 70-100 tok/s (full precision)
- Optimized estimate: 100-130 tok/s (4-bit quantization)
- First token latency: 300-500ms (vs 500-800ms on M3 Pro)
Metal Optimization (MLX)
Apple Silicon deployment is highly optimized for Metal via MLX framework:
- Native M-series chip support
- Efficient unified memory utilization
- Typically achieves 60-80 tok/s on M3 Max; M3 Ultra should exceed this
Quantization Options
4-bit Quantization (Recommended)
- Quality: Minimal degradation from full precision
- Speed: Optimal balance
- Memory: ~30GB
- Use case: General production deployment
- Available formats: GGUF (Q4_K_M), MLX 4-bit
5-bit Quantization
- Quality: Similar to 4-bit in practice
- Speed: Slightly slower than 4-bit
- Memory: ~37GB
- Recommendation: 4-bit preferred for better speed/quality ratio
8-bit Quantization
- Quality: Near full precision
- Speed: Good performance
- Memory: ~60GB
- Use case: Quality-critical applications with sufficient RAM
- Available: MLX 8-bit (gs32)
2-bit Quantization (Q2_K, IQ2_XXS)
- Quality: Noticeable degradation
- Speed: Fastest
- Memory: ~15GB
- Use case: Memory-constrained systems only (not recommended for M3 Ultra)
Recommendation for M3 Ultra
With 256GB RAM, you should use:
- Primary choice: Full precision (BF16/FP16) for maximum quality
- Alternative: 8-bit for slight speed boost with negligible quality loss
- Avoid: 2-bit and 4-bit unless you need to run multiple large models simultaneously
Deployment Methods
1. Ollama (Easiest - Recommended for Beginners)
- Version required: 0.14.3 or later
- Features: Automates format handling (GGUF), simplifies quantized deployment
- Installation:
Terminal window # Install Ollamacurl#2A2E3A;--1:#DADDE5"> #25723F;--1:#82D99F">-fsSL#2A2E3A;--1:#DADDE5"> #25723F;--1:#82D99F">https://ollama.ai/install.sh#2A2E3A;--1:#DADDE5"> |#2A2E3A;--1:#DADDE5"> sh# Pull GLM 4.7 Flashollama#2A2E3A;--1:#DADDE5"> #25723F;--1:#82D99F">pull#2A2E3A;--1:#DADDE5"> #25723F;--1:#82D99F">glm-4.7-flash# Run the modelollama#2A2E3A;--1:#DADDE5"> #25723F;--1:#82D99F">run#2A2E3A;--1:#DADDE5"> #25723F;--1:#82D99F">glm-4.7-flash
2. MLX (Best for Apple Silicon)
- Framework: Apple’s Metal-accelerated ML framework
- Performance: Optimized for M-series chips
- Quantization: Native support for 4-bit, 8-bit
- Installation:
Terminal window # Install MLXpip#2A2E3A;--1:#DADDE5"> #25723F;--1:#82D99F">install#2A2E3A;--1:#DADDE5"> #25723F;--1:#82D99F">mlx#2A2E3A;--1:#DADDE5"> #25723F;--1:#82D99F">mlx-lm# Download model from Hugging Face (mlx-community)# Run with mlx-lm
3. llama.cpp (Advanced - Maximum Control)
- Features: Direct GGUF model loading, extensive configuration options
- Performance: Excellent with proper optimization
- Use case: Advanced users needing fine-grained control
- Installation:
Terminal window # Clone and build llama.cppgit#2A2E3A;--1:#DADDE5"> #25723F;--1:#82D99F">clone#2A2E3A;--1:#DADDE5"> #25723F;--1:#82D99F">https://github.com/ggerganov/llama.cppcd#2A2E3A;--1:#DADDE5"> #25723F;--1:#82D99F">llama.cppmake# Download GGUF model# Run with custom parameters./main#2A2E3A;--1:#DADDE5"> #25723F;--1:#82D99F">-m#2A2E3A;--1:#DADDE5"> #25723F;--1:#82D99F">model.gguf#2A2E3A;--1:#DADDE5"> #25723F;--1:#82D99F">-n#2A2E3A;--1:#DADDE5"> 512#2A2E3A;--1:#DADDE5"> #25723F;--1:#82D99F">-c#2A2E3A;--1:#DADDE5"> 8192
4. vLLM & SGLang (Production Deployment)
- Features: High-throughput inference, batching, API serving
- Use case: Production environments, API services
- Performance: Optimized for serving multiple requests
Model Availability
Official Sources
- Hugging Face: zai-org/GLM-4.7-Flash
- Hugging Face (Base): zai-org/GLM-4.7
- OpenRouter API: z-ai/glm-4.7-flash
- Official Docs: Z.AI Developer Documentation
Quantized Versions
- GGUF: AaryanK/GLM-4.7-GGUF
- MLX 8-bit: mlx-community/GLM-4.7-8bit-gs32
- Various quantization options available through community repositories
Comparison with Other GLM Models
GLM 4.7 Flash vs GLM 4.5
- GLM 4.5: Previous flagship, known for 90.6% tool use success rate
- GLM 4.7 Flash: Newer model optimized for coding and local deployment
- Size: GLM 4.5 (unknown parameters) vs GLM 4.7 Flash (30B-A3B MoE)
- Specialization: GLM 4.5 (tool use, agentic workflows) vs GLM 4.7 (coding, reasoning)
Model Series Evolution
- GLM 4.5: Tool use champion (90.6% beats Claude 4 Sonnet)
- GLM 4.6: Intermediate release
- GLM 4.7: Coding and reasoning focus
- GLM 4.7 Flash: Optimized lightweight version for local deployment
Use Cases & Recommendations
Ideal Use Cases
- Coding assistance - State-of-the-art for 30B class
- Local development environments - Runs efficiently on consumer hardware
- Algorithmic problem-solving - Strong LiveCodeBench performance
- Real-world bug fixing - Excellent SWE-bench results
- Privacy-sensitive applications - Full local deployment capability
When to Choose GLM 4.7 Flash
- Need SOTA coding performance in 30B class
- Have 24GB+ GPU or Mac M-series with 24GB+ unified memory
- Value speed (60-80 tok/s) over absolute maximum quality
- Require local deployment without cloud dependencies
- Want balance between model size and capability
When to Choose Alternatives
- Need maximum tool use: GLM 4.5 (90.6% tool use success)
- Need maximum reasoning: Qwen3-235B or DeepSeek-V3.2
- Budget/speed critical: Smaller models (7B-14B class)
- Maximum coding performance: GPT-5.2 or Claude Opus (proprietary)
Practical Recommendations for Your Setup
Given your Mac Studio M3 Ultra with 256GB RAM, here’s the optimal approach:
Immediate Setup (Best for Most Users)
- Install Ollama (simplest deployment)
- Pull GLM 4.7 Flash
- Start with default settings (likely 4-bit quantization)
- Monitor performance - should see 80-100+ tok/s
Advanced Setup (Maximum Quality)
- Use MLX framework for native Apple Silicon optimization
- Deploy in 8-bit or full precision (BF16/FP16)
- Enable large context windows (64K-200K)
- Expect 70-100 tok/s with superior quality
Production Setup (API Serving)
- Use vLLM or SGLang for API serving
- Configure batching for multiple requests
- Monitor memory usage and adjust context limits
- Set up monitoring/logging
Cost-Benefit Analysis
- Your hardware: Significantly over-provisioned for this model
- Opportunity: Can run full precision without compromise
- Multi-model: Consider running 2-3 models simultaneously for different tasks
- Future-proof: Ready for larger models (70B+ full precision possible)
Sources
- zai-org/GLM-4.7-Flash · Hugging Face
- GLM-4.7-Flash: The Ultimate 2026 Guide to Local AI Coding Assistant | Medium
- GLM-4.7-Flash: How To Run Locally | Unsloth Documentation
- GLM-4.7 - Overview - Z.AI Developer Documentation
- GLM-4.7-Flash | Hacker News Discussion
- GLM-4.7-Flash: Release Date, Free Tier & Key Features (2026) | WaveSpeedAI Blog
- llm-benchmarks/results/glm-4.7-flash | GitHub
- zai-org/GLM-4.7 · Hugging Face
- GLM 4.7 Flash - API, Providers, Stats | OpenRouter
- A Technical Analysis of GLM-4.7 | Medium
- Zhipu AI Launches GLM-4.7-Flash | Techloy
- GLM-4.7: Pricing, Context Window, Benchmarks | LLM Stats
- GLM-4.7 - Model Info, Parameters, Benchmarks | SiliconFlow
- AaryanK/GLM-4.7-GGUF · Hugging Face
- GLM 4.7: A Complete Deep Dive | AiCybr Blog
- How to Use GLM-4.7-Flash Locally | Apidog
- Run GLM-4.7-Flash Locally: Ollama, Mac & Windows Setup | WaveSpeedAI
- How to Run GLM 4.7 Flash Locally | DataCamp
- How to Use GLM-4.7-Flash Locally | CometAPI
- VLLM running GLM-4.7-Flash | Medium
- mlx-community/GLM-4.7-8bit-gs32 · Hugging Face
- GLM-4.7 vs GLM-4.6 vs DeepSeek-V3.2 vs Claude 4.5 vs GPT-5.1 | Medium
- AI Model Benchmarks Jan 2026 | LM Council
- AI Leaderboards 2026 | LLM Stats
- GLM-4.7: Advancing the Coding Capability | Z.AI Blog
- LLM Leaderboard 2026 | LLM Stats
- GLM-4.7 vs GPT-5.1 & Gemini 3 Pro: Coding Benchmarks 2025 | Vertu